Community Solution

Windows Error 0x80070299 Copying Files to ZimaOS: How the Source Ruled Out RAID, Disks, MTU, and the NAS

A January-March 2026 troubleshooting thread where certain .ts files failed around 99.9% with Windows error 0x80070299 / Robocopy ERROR 665. RAID and SMART were healthy, rebuilding the RAID with different disks changed nothing, MTU was 1500, and the same files copied successfully from other Windows PCs. The source therefore isolated the problem to the original Windows 11 Ryzen client/network stack, though the exact Windows fix remained unresolved.

This thread is a good example of diagnosis by elimination. At first, a Windows copy that failed at the last few percent looked like an SMB or RAID write problem. The community checked RAID health, SMART, kernel logs, Robocopy, and MTU. The user even rebuilt the NAS as a new RAID5 array using different disks—and the same files still failed from the same Windows PC.

The decisive test came later: the exact same files copied successfully to the same ZimaOS share from other Windows machines. That isolates the source problem to the original Ryzen Windows 11 client or its network stack/driver path, not the ZimaOS storage array. The exact client-side repair was never established.

ZimaOS terminal showing RAID5 md0 healthy with all four members active as UUUU during copy-error troubleshooting
The source RAID reported all four members active, making a degraded-array explanation unlikely.

Explorer and Robocopy Failed Near 99.9%

The affected files were TV-recording .ts files. Windows Explorer failed near the end, and Robocopy reproduced the same behavior with:

ERROR 665 / 0x00000299

Using a different copy tool therefore did not solve the source problem.

Windows Robocopy failing at 99.9 percent with ERROR 665 while copying a TS file to the ZimaOS SMB share
Robocopy reproduced the same late-stage failure, ruling out a simple Windows Explorer UI problem.

SMART and RAID Checks Did Not Show a Disk Failure

The posted SMART screenshots showed zero pending, reallocated, and uncorrectable sectors on the checked drives, and the RAID reported [UUUU].

SMART output for one ZimaOS RAID disk showing zero reallocated pending and offline uncorrectable sectors
The source's drive-health evidence did not support a failing-disk root cause.

A Completely New RAID with Different Disks Still Failed from the Same PC

Didier rebuilt the system using four different 3 TB drives in RAID5. The same transfer problem remained. That is strong evidence against the original 1 TB disks or one specific array being the cause.

The Same Files Worked from Other Windows PCs

The original poster later tested the same content from other machines and said it copied normally. In March they repeated the experiment from another Windows 11 Pro PC and again succeeded.

This is the strongest isolation test in the entire thread.

MTU Was Already 1500 Everywhere

The community suggested ruling out a jumbo-frame mismatch. The user confirmed all devices were at MTU 1500, so the source case was not explained by one link using jumbo frames while another did not.

SMB1 Was Already Disabled

Another test checked whether an old SMB protocol might be involved. The user reported SMB1 was already disabled, which is appropriate for modern Windows/ZimaOS networks.

Server Logs Were Still Worth Checking, but the Cross-PC Test Was Stronger

The community asked for read-only ZimaOS logs immediately after failure:

dmesg -T | tail -200
journalctl -n 200 --no-pager

Those can reveal resets/timeouts. But once other PCs copied the same files to the same NAS successfully, the original Windows client became the highest-value place to troubleshoot.

What to Check on the Affected Windows PC

  • NIC driver and firmware;
  • advanced NIC offload/energy settings;
  • VPN/filter/security software;
  • Windows networking stack corruption;
  • the specific Ethernet/Wi-Fi adapter and cable/path;
  • a clean boot or different NIC as a controlled test.

A full Windows reinstall was suggested by the community as the most certain reset, but the source user did not confirm performing one or finding the exact failing driver.

The .ts File Extension Was Not the Root Cause

Only some transport-stream recordings failed from the original PC, which initially made the file type look suspicious. But the same exact files copied successfully from another Windows machine. That rules out a ZimaOS policy that simply rejects .ts files.

Try a Different Network Adapter Before Reinstalling Windows

Because the final evidence points at one PC, a low-risk next test is to use another Ethernet adapter, Wi-Fi interface, USB NIC, cable, or switch port while keeping the same Windows installation and file. If the transfer succeeds, the problem can be narrowed toward the original NIC/driver path without rebuilding the whole workstation.

Temporarily Isolate Third-Party Network Filters

VPN clients, endpoint security, traffic shapers, virtual switches, packet-capture drivers, and motherboard network suites can insert filter drivers into the Windows networking stack. A clean boot or controlled disable/uninstall test can identify this layer.

Do not permanently disable endpoint security just to make SMB work; the goal is diagnosis.

The Source's “Size on Disk” Difference Was Consistent with an Incomplete Transfer

The user later noticed the network copy occupied less space than the original. Because the failing PC repeatedly stopped at the final stage, a smaller/incomplete destination file is expected and does not by itself indicate that ZimaOS compressed or corrupted the file.

A Full Windows Reinstall Was Suggested, Not Proven

The community called a clean OS reinstall the most certain way to reset an unknown client networking problem. The original poster did not report performing a complete clean install, so that should remain a last-resort option rather than the source-confirmed solution.

SMB Copy Error FAQ

Did the source prove ZimaOS RAID was corrupt?

No. RAID/SMART were healthy, a new array with different disks behaved the same, and other PCs copied the same files successfully.

Did Robocopy solve the problem?

No. Robocopy reproduced ERROR 665 near 99.9%.

What did the final evidence isolate?

The original Windows 11 Ryzen PC or its network/client stack, while the exact client-side fix remained unresolved.